The Federal High Court in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, on Thursday struck out the criminal charges filed by the Federal Government against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan after the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) formally withdrew the case.
Court filings revealed that the AGF submitted a Notice of Discontinuance, prompting the court to terminate the criminal defamation and related allegations previously brought against the senator representing Kogi Central.
The case, which had drawn significant national attention, stemmed from comments allegedly made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a televised interview and had sparked extensive public discourse on free speech, political accountability, and the scope of prosecutorial authority.
The notice, dated December 12, 2025, effectively ended proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025.
In his ruling, Justice C. N. Oji acknowledged the withdrawal and struck out the charges, noting that the development underscored the importance of caution in the exercise of prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing, and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” Justice Oji stated.
Counsel for the federal government confirmed the withdrawal in open court, saying the decision aligned with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.
“On behalf of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, we have filed a notice of discontinuance,” the prosecution said. “This decision is taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.”
Reacting after the court session, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan described the ruling as a vindication of her stance.
“I have been vindicated. Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law,” she said. “I remain committed to serving my constituents and to defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians.”
She also thanked her legal team and supporters for their steadfast backing throughout the legal battle.
The striking out of the charges comes after months of legal controversy and sustained public discourse, during which several civil society organisations criticised the prosecution, describing it as an attempt to stifle free speech and political engagement.